Can DSPs be culpable in maltreatment suits if they know about rights violations but don’t report them?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Boost your knowledge as a Direct Support Professional. Ace your test with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question includes hints and explanations. Prepare confidently!

The assertion that DSPs can be culpable in maltreatment suits if they know about rights violations but fail to report them is correct. Direct Support Professionals have a duty to advocate for the individuals they support, which includes recognizing and addressing any violations of rights. When a DSP becomes aware of potential maltreatment or abuse and does not report it, they can be held accountable legally and ethically for their inaction.

This responsibility is critical because failing to report a known rights violation can contribute to ongoing harm to vulnerable individuals. Reporting suspected maltreatment is an essential part of protecting the rights and well-being of those receiving support. This duty to report is often reinforced by training and legal obligations, making awareness and advocacy key components of the DSP role. By not reporting, a DSP could be seen as complicit in any resulting harm or abuse, which can lead to liability in maltreatment suits.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy